Court of Justice of the European Union: in case of long delay of a flight is the company which decided to perform the flight which must pay the compensation
The Court of Justice of the European Union has determined today that in the case of long delay of a flight, the air company which must pay the compensation owed to passengers is not the air company which leased the aircraft and its crew, but the air company which decided to perform the flight (Judgment in Case C-532/17. 4 July 2018).
Mr Wolfgang Wirth and other passengers reserved a flight from Hamburg (Germany) to Cancún (Mexico) with the air company TUIfly. In order to operate that flight, TUIfly used the aircraft and crew of another air company, Thomson Airways, under a ‘wet lease’. In that regard, the booking confirmation stated that the bookings were issued by TUIFly, but that the flight was ‘operated’ by Thomson Airways.
Since the flight was significantly delayed, Mr Wirth and the other passengers claimed from Thomson Airways the compensation to which they considered themselves entitled under the Regulation on Air Passenger Rights.1 Thomson Airways refused to pay compensation on the ground that it was not the operating air carrier for the purposes of that regulation. 2 According to Thomson Airways, given that TUIFly bore the operational responsibility for the performance of the flight, the claim for compensation must be brought against the latter air company only.
It is in that context that the Landgericht Hamburg (Regional Court, Hamburg, Germany) asks the Court of Justice to clarify the concept of an ‘operating air carrier’.
In today’s judgment, the Court holds that an air company which decides to perform a particular flight, including fixing its itinerary, and, by so doing, offers to conclude a contract of air
carriage with members of the public must be regarded as the operating air carrier. The adoption of such a decision means that that air company bears the responsibility for performing the flight, including, inter alia, any cancellation or significantly delayed time of arrival.
Accordingly, an air company, such as, in this case, Thomson Airways, which leases an aircraft, including its crew, under a wet lease to another air company, but does not bear the
operational responsibility for the flight, cannot be regarded as the operating air carrier for the purposes of that regulation. It is irrelevant in that regard that the booking confirmation of the flight issued to passengers states that the flight is operated by the former air company.
Click here for further information.