
Freedom of the press and prohibition on disclosing inside information (Court of Justice of the European Union)
Freedom of the press: the disclosure by a journalist of inside information relating to the forthcoming publication of an article reporting rumours concerning companies listed on the stock exchange is lawful where it is necessary for the purpose of carrying out a journalistic activity and respects the principle of proportionality
According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (Case C‑302/20, 15 March 2022) information relating to the forthcoming publication of a press article reporting a market rumour concerning an issuer of financial instruments is capable of constituting information ‘of a precise nature’ and, therefore, of falling within the scope of the concept of ‘inside information’, where it mentions, inter alia, the price at which the securities will be purchased, the name of the journalist who authored the article and the media organisation which will publish it.
The disclosure of inside information for the purpose of journalism may be justified, under EU law, by virtue of the freedom of the press and the freedom of expression. The ‘purposes of journalism’ may cover investigative work carried out by the journalist in preparation for publication, in order to verify rumours.
However, the disclosure of inside information by a journalist is lawful only where it is regarded as being necessary for the exercise of his or her profession and as complying with the principle of proportionality.
The national court must therefore examine the following questions:
- first, was it necessary for the journalist seeking to seek to verify a market rumour to disclose to a third party, not only the content of that rumour, but the fact that an article reporting that rumour would soon be published?
- Secondly, is the restriction on the freedom of the press which the prohibition of such disclosure would entail excessive – taking into account the potentially dissuasive effect on the exercise of journalistic activity and the rules and codes to which journalists are subject – by comparison with the harm which such a disclosure is liable to cause, not only to the private interests of certain investors but also to the integrity of the financial markets?